Thanks for Newton but i need soft-body support))
@Vet check your PM

I prefer PhysX, becurse i is a very good Physic enging with many effects and all Nvidia Gerforce 8xxx with newest driver can use it. (since dirver 177.xx is the Physix driver includet and it works great ).

By
White_Wolf

Can't really apreciate the Nvidia PhysX, because it's not supported by ATI. This would mean your product can't be run optimal by app. 48% of the computerusers. I think thats why Havoc is much better. It's just better supported

Am I getting this right. PhysX is supported by Nvidia by their hardware, so the gpu can calculate part of the physics?

How about Havoc, is it supported by any hardware?

If not, I'd say PhysX is the better choice because it is supported by about have of all graphic cards and about the same as Havoc for all the others.
It's better to have some supported hardware then none as long as it runs good enough without the hardware support.

physx supported by nvidia doenst mean it doesnt work on ati.

it is just not hardware accelerated.. e.g. newton 2 is not hardware accelarated by both nvidea and ati.

in my opinion havoc is better than physX