GED looks good, i`m waiting for that!!!!

Now i?m work with my own script for create, moving, rotate and scale Models "in the game". But i have to save all this Modelcoordinates and other stuff in a external txt file and set them with ent_create. Not the best solution, but better than WED. It is really hard to set some Models over a terrain at the right position with WED.

Back to the original question: The WED 3D window can't render much faster. But there are many methods to navigate faster, for instance reducing the view depth, switching off parts of the level, or rendering blocks when the camera is moved.

For real faster rendering you'd need the engine to render the window, as in GED.

Yes. And if WED is to be useful as a tool, then the engine should render in the perspective window, as in GED. I realize that GED has it place (and, frankly, I still need to test it ... perhaps later today), but it just makes since to have ONE editor (not WED, GED, etc) to create and/or put together your level, level lighting, entities, etc.

I fully agree. Gamestudio needs ONE good editor.

Probably GED are the star of a transition
I hope not stop like truespace

GED can be plugged into WED.

It's not quite the same thing as having the ability to access GED (open and run the program) from within WED as it is to have WED's view ports improved. All we can do in GED is place already created objects. I can't create anything in GED. Currently you cannot even place lights (though they say that will come in the future).

In my opinion, either WED needs to be improved or dropped. Let us create 3D content completely in another 3D application and simply use GED to put it all together, or make WED a competent package all around. WED is not bad (in my opinion), but it could be so much more.

Maybe if GED is good enough then WED will become Pro only feature for create CSG and BSP map.

Everyone will miss WED

This first step with GED is an indicator that they are working on improving the current situation.
Regardless how often you complain here, always remember that Rome wasn't built in a day.
At least in our world, where we don't have magic powers

Haha. I agree. However, Conitec seems to be moving fairly slowly and GED is not the first time they had tried to have a separate mode for placing objects. The previous project failed, if I remember correctly. GED may be a step in the right direction. I don't know. We shall see and I am willing to wait. However, at this point in time it does not look like WED is going away. If it is here to stay, then what I suggested remains true. The view port speeds need to be improved and the visual quality needs to be improved. Even modo, with its advanced OpenGL view, displays a much nicer real-time 3D environment with full effects for bump maps, normal maps and OpenGL reflections.