looks nice but i think there are some artifacts caused by the mixing of fixed function and vertex shader materials. i have this problem too in my projects but it should be fixed in 2.6:

How long did it take to port Krönlein?
And, what were the difficult parts?

BTW, the camera movement has an interesting concept, its almost like bending your neck backward and forward. I noticed this, when standing with the back to a wall and looked upward.

Awesome news! We tried to work with anti-aliasing, then those artifacts arnt that bad anymore but then we are not able to use post processing effects. This issue with anti-aliasing and pp effects seems to be an overall problem
Maybe its just to complex to implement it to a commercial engine.



I dont know exactly how long it did take to port Krönlein, we spent a lot of time with experimenting and testing.
But I guess when the 3D Content and all the textures are ready for export, its just a matter of hours. The import/export pipeline from unity is just amazing.

The camera movement is still work in progress. As you said its an interesting concept but it disturbs when you are near a wall and looking downward. The camera then goes through the geometry.

cheers

Sinn- und Zwecklos

To be honest, when I read something like this...

(Random rotation)
http://forum.unity3d.com/viewtopic.php?t=22187&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

...then I´m a littlebit scared.

The British Army are using Unity for it's latest recruitment campaign online.
There's a couple of missions to play with more to come..

https://www.armyjobs.mod.uk/startthinkingsoldier/Pages/Default.aspx

dould not find anything made with, unity, the 3d game is made with Flash... It's pretty neat for a flash game tho..

Huh? You're scared of some noob? then the beginner-forum in this forum must be a ghost train for you

What's scaring is that a row of answers and tests didn't show any proper result.

No, I´m rather concerned about complicated functions like setting the pan angle of an object to a random value.

This seems not to be very intuitive.

Of course everything is object oriented, but it scares me that
such simple functions are cluttered into more than one line:

var temp : GameObject = Instantiate(prefab, position, Random.rotation);
temp.transform.eulerAngles.y = 0;

I prefer "ENTITY.pan = random(360);" - but that´s just me.

Edit: Pappenheimer has nailed it pretty well.

errrmm...
I done that in my game, so the rotating items won't looking all the same.
this is the code:
transform.eulerAngles.y = Random.value*180;

and it works.

really, it seems that some guys are nitpicking everything just to get something that they don't like about unity...


also, if someone is interesting, this is the last status of my game, made with the unity trial. need yet to buy the full version:

http://www.bysamb.de/priv/unity/rollingballweb1.html


edit:
before anyone cries it out loud: yes, in this version they are all rotated the same, I need to change the code to:
transform.parent.eulerAngles.y = Random.value*180;
but since the trial is over, I couuldn't do that.