Maybe Conitec sould remove file_cpy

Gamestudio Links

Zorro Links

Change chart colours
by 7th_zorro. 05/11/24 09:25

Data from CSV not parsed correctly
by dr_panther. 05/06/24 18:50

AUM Magazine

Latest Screens

1 registered members (AndrewAMD), 1,089 guests, and 2 spiders.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Newest Members

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Page 2 of 2

Re: Maybe Conitec sould remove file_cpy [Re: FBL] #328585 06/14/10 07:32 06/14/10 07:32
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 3,232 Australia EvilSOB Expert
EvilSOB Expert Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 3,232 Australia	the .pak is just to tell the engine to look in the wrs. You can also use it to copy any file from pointA to pointB on the hard-drive... "There is no fate but what WE make." - CEO Cyberdyne Systems Corp. A8.30.5 Commercial

Re: Maybe Conitec sould remove file_cpy [Re: EvilSOB] #328587 06/14/10 07:40 06/14/10 07:40
Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 9,859 F FBL Senior Expert
FBL Senior Expert F Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 9,859	Yes, but afaik you cannot copy foobar.bmp from resource to disk. You need to rename it to foobar.pak BEFORE resourcing.

Re: Maybe Conitec sould remove file_cpy [Re: FBL] #328592 06/14/10 08:16 06/14/10 08:16
Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 3,232 Australia EvilSOB Expert
EvilSOB Expert Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 3,232 Australia	Dunno about that, I dont have pro, so Im only educated-guessing... "There is no fate but what WE make." - CEO Cyberdyne Systems Corp. A8.30.5 Commercial

Re: Maybe Conitec sould remove file_cpy [Re: EvilSOB] #328596 06/14/10 08:52 06/14/10 08:52
Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 27,986 Frankfurt jcl Chief Engineer
jcl Chief Engineer Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 27,986 Frankfurt	Due to the .pak extension, file_cpy can only extract files that are intentionally allowed to be copied.

Page 2 of 2

Moderated by old_bill, Tobias

oP group Germany GmbH | Birkenstr. 25-27 | 63549 Ronneburg / Germany | info (at) opgroup.de