Gamestudio Links
Zorro Links
Newest Posts
loading historical data 1st time
by AndrewAMD. 04/14/23 12:54
Trade at bar open
by juanex. 04/13/23 19:43
Bug in Highpass2 filter
by rki. 04/13/23 09:54
Adding Limit Orders For IB
by scatters. 04/11/23 16:16
FisherN
by rki. 04/11/23 08:38
AUM Magazine
Latest Screens
SHADOW (2014)
DEAD TASTE
Tactics of World War I
Hecknex World
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 938 guests, and 4 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
rki, FranzIII, indonesiae, The_Judge, storrealba
18919 Registered Users
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: and again : nvidia vs. radeon [Re: Paul_L_Ming] #40360
03/08/05 14:25
03/08/05 14:25
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
I
iSO_BigD Offline
Guest
iSO_BigD  Offline
Guest
I

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Just out of curiosity...you wouldn't be testing the game/demo on DIFFERENT generations of cards, would you?...like say, a DX9 ATI card, supporting those pixel shader effects and a DX7-8 NVIDIA card that doesn't?

ATI Radeon 9500+ and NVIDIA Geforce FX+ = DX9 cards...the ones before that aren't.

Re: and again : nvidia vs. radeon [Re: iSO_BigD] #40361
03/30/05 19:54
03/30/05 19:54
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,550
United Kingdom
indiGLOW Offline
Serious User
indiGLOW  Offline
Serious User

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,550
United Kingdom
From my reading up on my Radeon 9800 I learned that it supports 2.0 shader, so with much anticipation I tried some of the new shaders presented here...

Now ok, it all honesty its most likely that I have done something wrong, but it seems that most of these cool shaders just give me a black object, and don't seem to run.

I wonder why this is? Maybe the 9800 isnt really 2.0? Or is there some kind of difference between implementing an Ati shader and a Nvidia one? Would explain why games developers tend to pick one over the other....


The Art of Conversation is dead : Discuss
Re: and again : nvidia vs. radeon [Re: indiGLOW] #40362
03/30/05 20:16
03/30/05 20:16
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,939
planet.earth
ello Offline OP
Senior Expert
ello  Offline OP
Senior Expert

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,939
planet.earth
that must be definately your fault: i think missing textures

note that i have a radeon9800, too

Re: and again : nvidia vs. radeon [Re: ello] #40363
03/31/05 00:15
03/31/05 00:15
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,550
United Kingdom
indiGLOW Offline
Serious User
indiGLOW  Offline
Serious User

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,550
United Kingdom
As much as I hate to admit it, Ello I think you are most probably correct!

I have just had a little success with a basic bump map shader from Steampipe so i just need to work from there...

If it runs on yours it should run on mine ....


The Art of Conversation is dead : Discuss
Re: and again : nvidia vs. radeon [Re: ello] #40364
03/31/05 11:23
03/31/05 11:23
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,236
San Diego, CA
M
Marco_Grubert Offline
Expert
Marco_Grubert  Offline
Expert
M

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,236
San Diego, CA
Quote:

ah.. so i think if i want to create shaders seriously i'll have to buy me a nvidiaCard as well. oky. which one is the current state of the art ?? something like 6800??


6800 cards come as 6800LE, 6800, 6800GT, 6800 Ultra (increasing performance/price). They all support VS/PS 3.0 and only differ in speed, memory, bandwidth and pipeline count. For testing purposes a 6800LE might suffice; for regular use 6800 or 6800GT are a good deal.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Blink, Hummel, Superku 

Gamestudio download | chip programmers | Zorro platform | shop | Data Protection Policy

oP group Germany GmbH | Birkenstr. 25-27 | 63549 Ronneburg / Germany | info (at) opgroup.de

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1