http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/455919

Nailed it hahaha, thanks for sharing! The bomb was quiet a blast, though

Haha, I just played the demo of the airport firefighter simulator thing.
I had to laugh a lot. Such games make me very happy. But then I was sad, because I remembered, that somewhere a mother watched at the gamebox and thought "Hey, my son loves firefighter and this big trucks, he will sure love to play a simulation with them!"

Ok, I think, with some knowledge of lod and some investment into some better motioncapturing
this game would be at least playable, but not less boring.
But it has nothing to do with the engine.
I am absolutly sure you can create good games with unity. If you have the talent,
you are probably able to create good games with gs and every other engine, too.
The engine is never a mesurement for the quality of the resulting product.

True, yet I believe that it is possible to make reliable game engine comparison for example about fps
However whenever you touch this point you get stupid, imho, answers such as well it depends on the type of game, shadows, number of polys the hardware and all that stuff

It is selfunderstanding

It should be possible to prepare a sort of test protocol which reflects the needs of an average modern game

From my experience Unity is very fast and 3dgs too

I'm glad to see your minds. The Tools doesnt matters. The own imagination and intension counts.

ah! another example for not existent gameplay.

In this case I dont know the used engine. So its not Unitys fault maybe. ......maybe

Its a Bus Simulation located in New York developed and published by UIG.

Here is the Test by 4Players (sorry in german). Poorly result is 2 points.

http://www.4players.de/4players.php/disp...imulation_.html