|
Re: Z1, Z2, Z12 - running together?
[Re: danatrader]
#480609
06/18/20 05:22
06/18/20 05:22
|
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 357
danatrader
OP
Senior Member
|
OP
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 357
|
I assumed, just I see often better performance on the Z1 + 2 in times Z12 seems to fail and vice versa. Just wondered, why are they from a technical approach not coded different, I mean like somewhat sepparated?
It really seems like sometimes one closes the trades of the other.
Last edited by danatrader; 06/18/20 15:43.
|
|
|
Re: Z1, Z2, Z12 - running together?
[Re: danatrader]
#480616
06/19/20 13:20
06/19/20 13:20
|
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,718 Chicago
AndrewAMD
Serious User
|
Serious User
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,718
Chicago
|
It really seems like sometimes one closes the trades of the other. Maybe you're in the wrong hedge mode? Use Hedge = 5 with Z12, and you'll get the proper desired diversification effect.
|
|
|
Re: Z1, Z2, Z12 - running together?
[Re: danatrader]
#480621
06/19/20 21:27
06/19/20 21:27
|
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 357
danatrader
OP
Senior Member
|
OP
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 357
|
Just cfhecked, but moved two days ago to a new server and restarted them (not resuming trades), I will keep an eye on them, cause I thought I maybe did see it wrong, but it was like already happening two or three times. Since they use the same .fac file, could it be cause they internally have the same algo name?
I really can't explain.
I see still trying to close trades on closed market.
0 22:04:05.169 Zorro EURUSD,H1: Close [USDCAD:S8301] 0.02@1.3633 => -13.010
Well, I see some access violation, I did change server cause the old one was to weak, so I seperated instances, it maybe was closed correctly and since the server was to weak, it didn't get through to the Zorro instance.
I will definitly keep an eye on it.
Thank you Andrew.
Last edited by danatrader; 06/19/20 21:28.
|
|
|
|