|
|
Re: An M4 carbine
[Re: Michael_Schwarz]
#53288
08/26/05 11:36
08/26/05 11:36
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,785 Jesusland
Towelie
Serious User
|
Serious User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,785
Jesusland
|
One little critique... The butt of the gun have a convex curve when it should be concave!! Or else it would be a very uncomfortable gun to hold...
Jimmy died, today, he blew his brains out into the bay, in the state of mind, its my own private suicide.
A stitch in time saves nine... what the hell does that mean?!?
|
|
|
Re: An M4 carbine
[Re: Ogtrax]
#53290
08/26/05 12:33
08/26/05 12:33
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,959 US
Grimber
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,959
US
|
I prefer the MP-5 rifle submachinegun. used it for 6 years while in the service it was far more reliable, easier to maintain, more durable, and just simply far easier to use in combat than any of the m16 line of weapons. http://www.hk94.com/hecklerkoch-mp5.html( the second picture of the police officer holding the MP-5 with solid stock is the same varient I used) it was also very useful in that the MP-5 rifle and my 9MM barettas ammo was interchangable most SF teams leave the m-16/M4 in the armory and only use them in yearly qualifications or for parades
|
|
|
|