Quote:

---

The matrix reloaded is on a t.v. behind me...

---

Quote:

---

Darwinian evolution has nothing to do with modern evolution! Who cares that darwin was wrong?

---

Tell that to Matt. I was just pointing out all the errors Darwin made. Matt takes this as a general insult to evolution itself, and refuses to admit what scientists have known for a long time (namely that Darwin got the details of evolution wrong).

edit:

Nice cartoon. Except the entire argument against creationism is a strawman. Number one, antibiotics resistance has nothing to do with evolution. It happens, yes, but we've found ancient bacteria that were resistant to penicillin years before the antibiotic was even invented. All the antibiotic did was kill off all the germs that weren't already resistant. That's not evolution, its simple natural selection (loss of genetic data). Furthermore, germs exchange plasmids with each other, and viruses can carry genetic snippets between populations. Both methods also provide resistance, but do nothing to explain where that data came from in the first place.

That cartoon, and evolution in general, is the epitome of ignorance. Thanks to evolutionists, you were taught what amounts to a lie about science, and the creationists are the ones who apparently know more about science in this case. Which theory is really stuck in the dark ages?

The cartoon was pretty funny though.

Quote:

---

Darwinian evolution has nothing to do with modern evolution!

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Ummm. How about you read up what your raving about, before posting. You just make yourself look stupid.

---

Actually you make yourself look stupid here...becasue what he writes makes sense and is based on facts.

---

Quote:

---

Nice cartoon. Except the entire argument against creationism is a strawman. Number one, antibiotics resistance has nothing to do with evolution. It happens, yes, but we\\\'ve found ancient bacteria that were resistant to penicillin years before the antibiotic was even invented. All the antibiotic did was kill off all the germs that weren\\\'t already resistant. That\\\'s not evolution, its simple natural selection (loss of genetic data). Furthermore, germs exchange plasmids with each other, and viruses can carry genetic snippets between populations. Both methods also provide resistance, but do nothing to explain where that data came from in the first place.

---

Quote:

---

pleeease! that\\\'s ridiculous! you can talk with any doctor about that but maybe cretinists shouldn\\\'t search help in modern medicine but in some voodoo priests...

---

I'm having a hard time understanding this because you apparently speak some kind of Engl///////sh. That's a language I'm not familiar with.

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics has nothing to do with evolution. Its a scientific fact that mislead evolutionists have a hard time coping with. Its been proven time and again, and even college biology textbooks teach it as fact to students.

Penicillin resistance existed years before penicillin. Viruses can carry DNA that provides resistance between species. Bacteria can exchange plasmids that provide resistance.

The ONLY mutations that provide a resistance, do so by destroying a natural part of the germ. For instance, the receptor that reacts to an antibody will be destroyed by a mutation. Which keeps it from dying, but it had to lose part of its structure to do so. That's the opposite of evolution.

Do you have a scientific response to this? Or are you just going to keep mumbling about voodoo priests? I suppose it doesn't help that evolution isn't scientific in the first place.

Quote:

---

I was responign to the fact that you say this guy looked stupid, when in fact he was showing how creationists belive in some absurd things.

---

Quote:

---

sorry, my browser has a malfunction which adds the \\\\\\.

---

Don't apologize, I was just giving you a hard time.

Quote:

---

just ask any doctor about this topic the next time you have the chance.

---