Quote:

I must also mention, to avoid misunderstandings, that this God before the ICC is not the Christian god. The usual Christian god, as believed by the majority of Christians, has not inflicted death upon Adam nor allowed the earth quake of Lisboa. He has not directly created man and has no direct influence on earth, so he's not responsible for natural death and disasters. Thus you can't catch him red-handed and drag him before a court.



Who said God did, or was responsible for, any of those things?

Quote:

However the God before the ICC is the US-fundamentalist God. As I've learned, fundamentalists believe their God has inflicted death and suffering as a revenge for Adam's disobedience, called the original "sin". Maybe someone can correct me if I'm wrong here. As the fundamentalist God can cause or prevent disasters at will, the question the court has to decide is not whether God is responsible or not. The question is indeed, as Nitro pointed out, whether the killing was murder or not.



As far as I see it, the deistic liberal version of God is even worse! He created the universe in such a way that it would be designed for suffering. That kind of sucks.

"The task force finds that...the unborn child is a whole human being from the moment of fertilization, that all abortions terminate the life of a human being, and that the unborn child is a separate human patient under the care of modern medicine."