Quote:

I'm not saying evolution has no evidence. What I'm saying is that some things (in fact many things) about evolution are believed indirectly based on that evidence.



Inderectly based on evidence? Like what? You can actually derive from these fossils that they must have been transitional. All evidence points in the right direction and everything that should be true if the theory is true ís true. The parts of the evolution theory that are questionable moreso have to do with early life, not so much with wether or not fossils are the evidence of transitional animals. Your statement about 'indirectly based on evidence' doesn't make much sense anyways, since we're talking about the long gone past. However remnants of that past are direct evidence. Take a murder scene for example, if you find the blood covered weapon, that would indeed be indirect evidence for a murder perhaps, but it's still solid evidence that it has actually happened. Can't say that about the bible.

Cheers

PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software