Quote:

---

Phemox, why do you twist my arguments ???

My argument was simply:
"The truth about medicine: sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn´t work."

---

Quote:

---

This is a simple observation of REALITY.
Ask your local doctor, if you don´t believe me here.

And please do not invent arguments, that I didn´t make:

I did not say, that - in case of illness - it is better to pray, instead of visiting a doctor.

---

Quote:

---

Let us please stick to the facts:
We both realise, that there are passages in the Bible, that are unacceptable, that there is the possibility, that someone, who claims to be a prophet isn´t telling the truth ...

For you - at least your arguments seem to imply this - this is reason enough, to question religion as a whole, or even God.

For me it is a simple and logical consequence of the difficult area, that religion deals with. Human beings are not infallible. Therefore it is only natural and logical, that there have been different attempts, opinions, attitudes etc.

And this was the reason, why I brought up the analogy with medicine:
There are also different opinions, attempts, attitudes etc.

But for me this does NOT mean, that I start to loose my basic trust in medicine.

---

Quote:

---

I mean, this is really something, that should not be denied, and if I simply acknowledge reality, for example, that operations sometimes don´t work, that a diagnosis may be wrong, this does NOT mean, that I´m an opponent of medicine as a whole.

---

Quote:

---

Now, why did I bring up this analogy?

Because most of your arguments - when it comes to religion - are following this logic: if I can find some mistakes, or different points of view, or a gradual development: The whole system must be wrong and God can´t exist.

But this is obviously a false logical conclusion, because in all areas of human research there is development, people are making mistakes, people try to improve, people have different opinions.

---