2 registered members (AndrewAMD, VoroneTZ),
1,258
guests, and 4
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
[Re: fastlane69]
#165288
11/03/07 20:42
11/03/07 20:42
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 968
EpsiloN
OP
User
|
OP
User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 968
|
Quote:
CLIENT BPS-- how much you send UNR/REL -- how many unreliable or reliable packets you receive. BPS PEAK -- should be for duration of client uptime.
Ok , its now a little more clear but still not enough...Bps , is it realy for one second , or a momentary value multiplyed by a factor to come up with the per second value...I think I should get some sort of a program to see how much my network card is sending/receiving atleast 16 times/sec. Is reliable/unreliable per second or at a given moment? And finaly , is Peak realy per second or again(as bps) measured for a moment and multiplyed (for example by dplay_entrate) to get the per second value? Currently I have : Client Bps average 80 Bps peak maximum I've seen is around 450 Rel/Unrel is around 80 I think , ~75...But this depends. 75 is with a Client & a server. If I have two clients , this becomes ~140/150 on each client. 75 on one client if he's not moving,if he is jumps to 150.
Server Bps average (Dunno,I forgot) Bps peak I think I've seen maximum 2400 (Caused by a 1 second update of 3 entities to each one of 3 clients,update of pos,frame,flags,alpha...I should try something else,if I want more clients,this Peak could produce serious lags if I have more clients) Rel / Unrel is diff. each time I test , last time it was around 80 with more frequent updating of a clients input(pan angle mostly). When I started (only movement,no rotation) it was less than 20.Max I've got it to 65 with constantly pushing each one of the movement buttons to 'simulate' maximum input for a client So , if we look at those numbers , it means that anyone can create a MMO with 3DGS. But somehow it doesnt work how it should. Its still laging. If I increase the update rate,theese numbers jump to higher values,so this isnt a solution. To prove that the people who say its impossible are wrong , I have only 2 words for them. Dead Reckoning. But for this 'prediction' I need to know what those numbers represent , in order to determine what are the limits for frequency in updating , and based on that , to construct this Dead reckoning function... Sorry if this post got too long , but I wanned to give my opinion on that matter , and to point out that I realy needed an in-depth explanation of the numbers.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/02/07 18:24
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/02/07 19:50
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/03/07 11:21
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/03/07 20:42
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/03/07 22:59
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/04/07 00:22
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/04/07 05:05
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/04/07 10:03
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/04/07 17:01
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/04/07 18:19
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/04/07 19:02
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/04/07 19:47
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/04/07 20:51
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/04/07 21:17
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/04/07 21:30
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/04/07 22:50
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/06/07 15:43
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/06/07 17:08
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/06/07 17:45
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/06/07 18:06
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/06/07 18:42
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/06/07 19:44
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
Damocles
|
11/06/07 22:33
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/06/07 23:24
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/07/07 16:02
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/11/07 19:21
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/12/07 15:53
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/12/07 18:07
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/14/07 15:32
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/14/07 17:45
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/14/07 19:15
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/14/07 20:35
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/15/07 17:14
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/15/07 21:03
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/15/07 21:53
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/16/07 04:57
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/16/07 07:12
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/16/07 13:07
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/16/07 15:45
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/16/07 17:17
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/16/07 18:13
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
fastlane69
|
11/16/07 19:15
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/16/07 20:38
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
EpsiloN
|
11/16/07 20:50
|
Re: Bps , bps peak & latency
|
FBL
|
11/16/07 21:13
|
|
|