it doesnt really take a genious to understand there had to be someone behind out creation
No. Sadly, it doesn't...
Yes , nuclear weapons far outweigh any of the good. You dont think so now , but wait till some fall close to where you live , i can assure you your mind would instantly change on the subject.
How do you feel about computers? You like them? You use them? Right, now, how do you feel about computers falling, say on your house or head? Damn those scientists for creating such a deadly instrument, damn you dirty apes!!!
Thus a challenge to you: try to find one weapon that scientists have purportedly created that does not have a positive counterpoint. For example, nuclear energy is easy to dismiss in terms of energy production and radiation therapy; until WWII this was the exclusive line of research and to this day, remain strong fields in nuclear physics research.
So as much good as science has done , it has done just as much bad, dont oversee it's darkside.
According to your own words, science is thus balanced and neither good nor evil, which is just how we like it. But I contend that it's better (or worse for why_do) than that: that scientists actually attach NO morality to their work and thus your labels of "good" and "bad" are your and society's labels and not scientific motivations.
Consider: If scientists are truly the bane of existence, then there has to be one pure representation of this, one pure weapon that has ZERO use outside of killing other human beings. There has to be some evidence that mainstream science (not some 5 or 10 year fad like spirituality or the aether) purposefully was working towards a massive means of destruction and evil; that scientists were untied under the banner of pain and misery and openly or secretly acknowledge that what motivates them is the pain, the glory, the fame, the women, the payoff, the job!!!! Right? Somewhere there has to be evidence of this if what you say is true, right?
My hypothesis is that you can't (or won't; same thing) and thus your latest thesis is wrong: scientists only create things; it's actually society, you, me, and everyone else, that actually uses what scientists create and assigns a morality to it. Again it's about why and how. A gamma ray is not evil; they happen all the time and are constantly falling on the earth. So how then does a gamma ray from Hiroshima become "evil"? Was it it's twin brother somehow? A whole bad side to teh Electro Magnetic family? None of course; it's evil because of the use that society put it to. It is not on the scientists my friend... it's on you and me and everyone else as members of a nationalistic world society right now.
BOTTOM-LINE CONCLUSIONS:
1) YOU ARE WRONG IN BELIEVEING THAT A BLACK HOLE CREATED AT THE LHC WILL DESTROY THE EARTH AND TIME WILL PROVE US RIGHT BY MERELY LIVING. This is unarguable since we merely have to wait to see what happens.
2) ASSUMING MY POINT 1 IS CORRECT AND WE LIVE, GIVEN THAT THE FUNDAMENTAL REASON YOU ARE WRONG IS THE SAME REASON YOU USE FOR YOUR OTHER ARGUEMENTS, I SUSPECT THAT AS MUCH AS 80% OF WHAT YOU SAY IS WRONG, IGNORANT, OR OTHERWISE MISINFORMED. This is arguable depending on why_do's further commitment to the forums. However, should he continue posting to Hilberts, then this prediction should come true with ~80% of his content being wrong. Again, no need to argue; time will tell if what happened on this thread (failure) will happen again.
3) THIS IS A MODEL YOU WILL HAVE TO GET USED TO WHY_DO: BEING PROVEN WRONG OVER TIME DUE TO EVIDENCE, DATA, AND EXPERIMENTATION. IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN, I ASSURE YOU...no matter how hard you pray, if you continue to use a) common sense as a guide for understanding the physical universe b) the idea that the existence of god makes any difference to the physical universe and c) that scientific theories and methodology are a conspiracy of thought aimed at harming the human race, then point 2 above will be proven true vigorously and vehemently over and over gain... but time will tell.
