And thus my points are reinforced:
a) Science is not good or evil; it is it's misuse or abuse by society that labels it as such.
b) There is no scientific investigation that does not have a good/positive effect as it's core reason to be even if it degenerates or is used in a bad/negative manner.

 Quote:
For all the positives there are negatives , now it's up to you to judge weather the positives outweigh the negatives , but with those negatives I think the answer should be clear.


A god-fearing ludite; how original. So it is your contention then that advancement should be stopped outright since according to this website they produce more negatives than positives?