Fastlane , you are a JOKE man. Plain and simple , I would tell you the proper words that describe you but sadly this forum is full of homosexuals and I would undoubtely get banned for it. But , a UFO is an UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT.


"This is exactly the same as people turning an undisputed fact (moving lights in the air) into a subjective interpretation (extraterrestrial vehicle)."

So you are saying you do believe they saw lights in the sky , but it was not an extraterrestial vehicle , however , it WAS a UFO right ? (look at the description of what a ufo is I put ontop).

But if you cannot prove it wasnt an alien ship , then it could very well be , and since this military officials believe it was , and they are trained officers , and they were there , then , I believe their testimony is much more credible and respectable than yours , someone who was not there , is not a trained air craft specialist , and has no idea of what they saw.

Where are your credentials ? What kind of training do you have that would qualify you to over rule their conclusions on the sucject considering their training and position . Further illuminate why we here should even mildly consider what you have to say versus what they have to say.

"As I've made clear before, I don't dispute the facts (people seeing something), I merely dispute their subjective interpretation (that there is no doubt, they are 100% sure, that they are alien craft)."

We arent even 100% sure we actually exist , how can you be so damnding of them ?
Scientists arent 100% sure what we are or where we are.
Scientists aren't 100% sure about evolution or the big bang.
Yet you seem to not have any problems with this , you only seem to require 100% when it comes to a subject you are in discordance with , which shows you are indeed of a true scientist nature, to only acknowledge what you agree with , and overlook and ignore the rest.