Fastlane , you are a JOKE man. Plain and simple , I would tell you the proper words that describe you but sadly this forum is full of homosexuals and I would undoubtely get banned for it.
Ahhh... so we've come to this again. As you yourself once stated, "those that cannot attack a person's point attack the person".
Took you a few days for you to lose you composure again. I'm proud of you, again, for making it this far!
(look at the description of what a ufo is I put ontop).
???? On top of your computer, on top of the fridge, on top of what? I don't see a description.
someone who was not there , is not a trained air craft specialist , and has no idea of what they saw.
Exactly. And neither were you. So we are faced with the situation of first believing that these people saw a UFO -- we both agree to this, as you say these are reputable people, so we both choose the same first belief. We may be wrong... they may have been on drugs or hit their head or any other number of reasons, but for the sake of arguement, this is an easy one to just since "fine, I accept you saw these lights".
But then we are faced with a further choice of believing them AGAIN in that the UFO is of extraterrestrial origin, that they in fact know somehow that it was not military or inter-dimensional or spiritual or anything else.
Here we disagree in that I believe it was still a UFO, still unidentified, since they have no outside evidence otherwise. After all, Unidentified does not mean it was Alien, not by a long shot.
While you believe them a second time in their conclusion that it was not a UFO but an IFO, Identified Flying Object, since you concur with their identification of the UFO as an Alien Craft.
Where are your credentials ? What kind of training do you have that would qualify you to over rule their conclusions on the sucject considering their training and position .
Deja Vu is such a tiresome thing...
I don't need to flash my credentials to make a point; I only need present facts and cohesive conclusions to make a point. That is the ONLY reason people on this forum listen to me... that's really the only people I listen to. And what they think of me or my ideas is of no concern tome... because they are listening... and continue to listen... as you have time and time again.
Further illuminate why we here should even mildly consider what you have to say versus what they have to say.
Why? LOL
We arent even 100% sure we actually exist , how can you be so damnding of them ?
I'm not being demanding of them; you are You are the person that is espousing the viewpoint that these are aliens, that they must be alien because AFAYK, there is no other reason, that they must be aliens because the people that saw the lights SAY it was aliens.
I on the other hand am the one espousing the viewpoint that they might be aliens or that they might be some other phenomena yet neither viewpoint can be proven conclusively at this time. I can however point once again to the Elves and Sprites as an example of weather phenomena that looks like 80% to 90% of all UFO sightings and thus underlies our complete ignorances as to the "U" in "UFO".
Thus that 100% comes from you and all the other eyewitnesses who are 100% convinced it was an Alien Craft and not just a UFO... remember, absolutism is your policy, not mine.
