Christtodd, maybe I may add a quote by a famous Christian?

"Revelation can only be considered valid for the original recipient. When subsequently communicated by the recipient to a second person, it ceases to be a revelation but rather becomes a hearsay second hand account, and consequently they are not obliged to believe it." (Thomas Paine)

So, a revelation can indeed give you the feeling that you understand how logic and science works, or that God is talking in your head, or whatever. But as this can not be communicated to other persons its a poor argument in a discussion.

I'm afraid when you want to talk about logic or science you must use logical or scientific arguments, your "revelation" wont do.