Quote:
to be taught this UNLESS it is stated that it is a theory NOT fact
didn't we just listen to a lengthy lecture about the difference between fact and theory?

Quote:
To me, it's these authors who show little or no religious or scientific bias that can go a long way to proving (or disproving) the origins of our religions and the Bible in particular.
Nobody is free from bias. Its just the impression they try to create. The idea of the Bible being true is not even in the realm of possibility for these 'scientists'. The idea of evolution being true is a foregone conclusion in todays science. No research whatsoever is being done to investigate any other alternatives. Evolution is accepted with 100% faith in all disciplines, while more mathematically solid models such as gravity and particle physics are constantly being tested and retested. Why dont they question or test evolution? Because in doing so they have to admit the possibility of a creator, which therefore makes them accountable for their actions.