Creationist friends , please once again

One thing is to claim that a theory is incomplete an other thing that it is false
A theory , any theory, is not supposed to explain everything.
If so, you should refute 99 % of the scientific theories

Evolutionism is considered a valid theory beacause it is consistent with all the available evidences
Creationism is considered a false theory because it is not consistent with some available evidences

If you want to be taken seriously , you must prove that :

a) At least one evidence is not consistent with evolutionism
Example : A fossil of dino's with the fossils of a modern mammal in his belly

b) All the evidences are consistent with the creationism

I emphasize the terms " at least one " and " all"