define "true". "less contradictory" does not qualify as "true", in my eyes. and is "truth" covering unspoken (assumed) things as well?

you can debate on the differences between the two books. but not on the "truth", as such thing does not exist in my opinion. there is "logic", "historic fact", "faith", "belief", "wonder", and what not. but the question of what is true and what not leads to nothing. you can debate, for example, on the historic facts of jesus, not on <<"his" "truth">>.

therefor, please define "truth", what it means to you.


PS: you will also have trouble finding people who have read both books completely. i'm still struggeling with the "completion" of the bible..