Still, intelligent design has the same pitfall than whole religions in general: no evidence. Not a single one. And no evidence means it doesn't exist.

Which makes the whole discussion about it as useful as a third foot. We could also discuss the skin colour of an alien in galaxy 1338 ... . What? Doesn't exist you say? But i have talked to him!





Hmm, must've overlooked this one. You say you have seen something like that? And even when, what is more likely, that really a human has arranged them, or that a god has arranged them? I for myself would look for footprints, and not cry immediately for a god as the explanation.

And that's the whole discussion between faith and science in general. Faith introduces a god for the only explanation of everything. And tries to discredit every evidence and everything in general that is against the faith. With all weapons. Because faith is the only truth. Science looks and searches for the real reasons. And doesn't care about doctrines or religions here. When something is proven then it is the one that is true. When something is disproven then it is the one that is untrue. Means when they would find a proof for a god then you can be sure that they will tell you. That easy. And now let's have a look what we have so far. Proofs for a god: zero. Proofs for intelligent design: zero ...

Or do you mean something different here?