Originally Posted By: heinekenbottle
Agnosticism is my stand point. I challenge anyone to prove there is a god and I challenge anyone to disprove it.


Agnosticism often seems to deny some facts as well, as in what we do know. Agnosticism values more what we do not know yet or can't know.

When something is impossible to be proven, doesn't this just mean it's untrue by definition? I mean, apart from the mere existence of these kinds of theories, there's nothing -quite literally- that points in this kind of direction (a God etc.).

Cheers


PHeMoX, Innervision Software (c) 1995-2008

For more info visit: Innervision Software