Originally Posted By: PHeMoX
Originally Posted By: heinekenbottle
Agnosticism is my stand point. I challenge anyone to prove there is a god and I challenge anyone to disprove it.


Agnosticism often seems to deny some facts as well, as in what we do know. Agnosticism values more what we do not know yet or can't know.

When something is impossible to be proven, doesn't this just mean it's untrue by definition? I mean, apart from the mere existence of these kinds of theories, there's nothing -quite literally- that points in this kind of direction (a God etc.).

Cheers


I think, for me any ways, it is more in a belief that it is possible that there is a god out there beyond science's grasp. Am I still trying to cling on in some way? Perhaps.

I guess Aliens would be a good analogy. You can't say they exist, but you can't say for sure that they don't.

Last edited by heinekenbottle; 12/22/08 23:13.
I was once Anonymous_Alcoholic.

Code Breakpoint;