Originally Posted By: Dooley
Both began with a single man, who made this claim. Now if those men are innocent until proven guilty, let's see your evidence

You completely understood my statement wrong! You are twisting words! These men are the claimants, not the defendants! What I want to say with this "innocent until proven guilty" is that you have to handle each claim like an accusion. If someone claims something to exist or to have been happened, you have to assume that this claim is wrong until proven true. You claim that god exists, so we have to assume that he doesn't exist, until you can show any evidence.
If I claimed that you killed 1000 people, you would be happy if the judge assumes that you are innocent until I prove that you are guilty, not the other way round, wouldn't you?