I already provided evidence, but it was rejected as being 'unscientific'.

That's why I'm arguing about morality. Morality does not need to be 'proven' in a lab, in order for people to act on it.

For the record, I never said that morality was an exclusively human trait. Nor did I say that religion should be forced upon anyone. I agree with you on these points.

Finally, having an open mind is good. This is how we learn about things that we don't understand yet. I'm learning a lot from our conversation. Are you?