Quote:
I already provided evidence,


Congrats. nobel prize is sure smile

Quote:
but it was rejected as being 'unscientific'.


Oh, you mean it was no evidence? wink

Quote:

That's why I'm arguing about morality. Morality does not need to be 'proven' in a lab, in order for people to act on it.


You still try to disprove science by proving faith. That will not work. You cannot disprove knowledge with fairytales. Knowledge will always win. Because knowledge is provable.

Your approach with using moral to achieve that goal is wrong anyways. Moral is in fact measurable. In the science called sociology. And, oh wonder, it follows the same rules in any society.

See, your moral is still part of science. But again nobody has found a god at work.

Quote:
Finally, having an open mind is good. This is how we learn about things that we don't understand yet. I'm learning a lot from our conversation. Are you?


Open minded as long as it follows what is written in a disproven 2000 year old book, right?

I learn alot too. But would prefer not to discuss in circles. We have already been at most of the told points wink

And again i repeat myself. Give me a proof for the existance of your pink elephant called god. Then let's talk again wink


trueSpace 7.6, A7 commercial
Free gamegraphics, freewaregames http://www.reinerstilesets.de
Die Community rund um Spiele-Toolkits http://www.clickzone.de