It gets worse for religion when it comes to 'proving the Bible' or any of the other holy scriptures as being historic.

Apart from the usual claims about names and having found a certain "Biblical" city, there's really no shred of evidence for any of the stories being historic. That is.. unless you accept the possibility that SOME details from these hugely exaggerated versions of what might have really happened are correct. But needless to say something 'being a possibility' doesn't need proof, so that won't get us further.

Of course you clever folks will probably think, yeah but just because they haven't found such proof yet, it could still be true and all. But looking at the amount of research already done, I'd say it's far beyond incredibly unlikely already.



I very much agree, but the difficult part is explaining them why it's all a lie.

Cheers