I'd like to thank everyone for taking the time to explain this all to me. I did not really see the difference between a 'theory' which is testable, and a 'conclusion' which is not testable, and how important this is for the scientific method.

My arguments about the historical connection between science and religion, is more suited to a history, or even religious studies class, not science class. I must say that I agree with the idea of teaching a lot of the different religions and world views, in an objective way, as some of you mentioned.

By the way, could someone please take the time to mention some of the facts about the theory of evolution. What are the testable evidences employed in proving this theory. I'm reading 'The Origin of Species' by Charles Darwin, but this very long book was not written for laymen such as myself. Perhaps there's a better book, or website for the novice, which you could direct me to.

Thanks.