That still wouldn't make such events different from pure chance or what you could call luck. Neither would it prove God's existence nor non-existence.

It's a lot like those people that claim God is trying to 'fool us' by putting fossils of very old animals in the ground. As if he has a motive to do such things.

I sort of gravely disagree here when there are a whole lot of reasons why God's existence is rather extremely unlikely and not one single reason why God's existence is likely.

If there's no proof in favor of God's existence and there are good arguments to assume it doesn't exist, then I think within the realm of our knowledge it makes perfect sense to claim God can not exist. Philosophical, logical and scientific proof combined certainly makes it ever more unlikely that there's such a thing as God.

Not really, because apart from the Biblical stories there's literally no tangible thing that suggests the Christian God must exist!! Remember how the Bible claims God has an influence or claims to know what kind of character God is, or how it talks about Jesus as the messiah?

It's the sole reason why Christians very often reply with 'because the Bible says so', instead of coming up with a logical reason why God must exist or did whatever they were arguing about. Their Bible is their answer, because according to them it is proof for the existence of their God. It defines their God.

You'd be right if you would argue that I have disproven the Christian God or God of the Bible. But from the perspective of Christianity, it makes no sense to look at God as something separate from the Bible at all.