Ran Man, you have a silly simlpe argumentation logic:

there is something that was created, it simpler compared to other things,
so other things must be created too.

You bring no logical argumentaion about all the
evolution topics stated here. Just phrases that you where taught in bible school.

Creationist dont follow scientific logig. Their whole argumentation
revolves around,
#1 creation must be true before proven, so it needs no prove.
#2 evolution is argumented against by picking topics that
simply had either no data (found yet) or had not
enough time to be explained / researched.

With this approach we would still be at a scientific stage
of Aristotele.

by the way, that japanese robot is not "humanlike", its
just a pupped with a lot of motors and some program
that makes it act preprogrammed or adapted movements. You could use a coffe machine in your example instead.

---

If you really want a "place" for gods creation, you could
take the events before the big bang.
As the time before that cant be explained scientifically,
for the lack of information about that stage.
So you may interpret the whatever cause into that.
But the events after the big bang, "belong" to science.