@RanMan:
The police generally do not arrest dads, just on a whim, but they have reasons.
This may be true, but according to Dan, he got set up by his wife, because he lost his faith in "their" religion.
I agree though, there's a good reason to assume, what is said to have happened, has happened. But without Dan being able to defend himself here, regardless of evil doings, it's just silly to even continue going on about this.
Dan's attorney said, according to the article:
"We're talking about one touch to the breast that lasted for just a moment..."
Is that the whole content of the accusation?
Yes. In fact, it's quite peculiar as the girl is said to be his own daughter. If there's no sexual motivation, I don't see why touching someone's breast would be harmful. Obviously, as long as there's no "pattern of abuse", as they say.
For example, I once touched someone's breast to prevent them from walking further and possibly getting under a truck... It wouldn't make sense to sue me for that either, right??
I think we should all agree that we can't possibly know the full background behind all this and should stop arguing.
