Also wanted to say something about that. But it's in vain, because most people won't accept any simple answer and them being not that into this stuff, explaining can be very hard.

Just one thing about the electron thingy; it is far more complex than you may think, and with Bohrs model you just try to model some facts. But keep in mind, that it is only a model, it can be used for certain thing but you can't port the macrocosmos to the microcosmos or the otherway round! It is just a model, a very simple model. Scientists can hardly describe the way of an electron, then there is the thing with not knowing where on the track this electron is. It is all a bit more complex than just sayin, ahh, electrons are perpetuum mobiles
And always keep in mind - it is just a model to cover certain physical phenomena - nobody knows what really goes on in these little dimensions. To describe certain things you also have to use different models, and there are way more models than just the one of Bohr.

So enough of it. If you want to know more, look up Heisenberg, Schrödinger & Co

The magnetic machine: Well nicely done but a waste of time because it loses energy, of course. It doesn't even run in vacuum, so you got to clean it. What now is the question of energy used to be the question to create gold. The alchemy was born and well - no one ever invented a process to get gold out of cheap components

The same applies for the perpetuum mobile - you can spend a lot of time improving new concepts etc. but it would be better to get a real job, because then you got at least a bit of money back