Also, when judging someone to be bad or good, then doesn't the act of judging require some interpretation as well - after all, I have to correlate actions with results and then somehow assign "moral points" to that.
Generally speaking, I can agree but this was not the point
See the Mary / Jane example in my previous post
I suppose that every body agree that Mary is a good person
while Jane is not
There is no room for " ethical relativism " or phylosophical subtilities in such a simple example
However a split brain guy may be of a different opinion
Not only
The same guy :
If ( right ear ) then Mary = good && Jane = bad
If ( left ear ) then Mary = bad && Jane = good
How can some people seriously speak of "free will" ?
