That has, as said, nothing to do with traditional patterns.
So you can't create a shouting star, nor the shooting star, or maybe you can.

Maybe you should have a look at the latest article of Petra on the TFH about Perry Kaufmann patterns.
You may find some clear difference.

But the pattern analyzer can also analyze different things, you could use the shooting star and maybe also the shouting star fom TA-LIB and take the return value of that (100 or -100) as one value of your pattern, besides other values, e.g. bool is close above or below SMA and so on.

if(adviseLong(PATTERN+2+RETURNS,0, <<------- PATTERN+2 devides the patterns in two groups, therefore input must be possible to be divided by two, RETURNS is the training target, the 0 is the number of features within a signals array if more than 3 are used.
priceHigh(2),priceLow(2),priceClose(2), <<------- PATTERN+2 means the lines are divided in two groups, which are compared, in this very case, the actual bar, and the previous bar, are grouped (0) and (1), then the other group previous bar (1) and (2) are grouped.
priceHigh(1),priceLow(1),priceClose(1),
priceHigh(1),priceLow(1),priceClose(1),
priceHigh(0),priceLow(0),priceClose(0)) > 50) <<----- then those price developments are comapred and the advise decides if go long or short on the pattern (compare within pattern groups)
enterLong();
if(adviseShort() > 50)
enterShort();
}


priceHigh(2),priceLow(2),priceClose(2), <<-------- group 1
priceHigh(1),priceLow(1),priceClose(1),


priceHigh(1),priceLow(1),priceClose(1), <<-------- group 2
priceHigh(0),priceLow(0),priceClose(0)