Thanks @AndrewAMD.

Let's assume for the sake of argument that I'm human. Meaning 2 things: lazy, and (even when not lazy) make mistakes. Since Zorro is not set-and-forget, I regularly monitor. Within that framework, for trading stocks, ETFs, etc. is there a better choice amongst:

- Expend the (on-going) effort to research & set each & every Asset at the correct Margin, expect that Results will match Test, and risk mistakes
- Be lazy and pick a Margin value (1, 2, whatever) and just use it for all Assets, accepting that Results will not match Test, and possibly Trading with Capital less than CR for added safety

Thanks.