Quote:

All scientists accept evolution.

What is all scientists? What qualifies one as a scientist in your opinion? Are you talking about people with associate degrees? Probably not.How about people with bachelors degrees? Probably not. How about a masters? Or do we need a Phd to be considered a scientist? Lets just assume that by "all scientists" you mean only people with PhD's. And to further refine our group, lets only choose people that have PhD's with Biological background, because a PhD in law or economics would not help us very much with the study of life.

All physicians have a strong biological background and all physicians have PhD's, so therefore they would have to qualify as your group of "All scientists". There have been several studies which have shown that the majority of physicians believe in God, miracles and creation, including this one:
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/dec/04122202.html

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42061

I have known doctors and biologists who have degrees up to their elbows which believe in God and are very much convinced of the complete farce of evolution. So please do not come up with these ridiculous, unsupported statements about "all scientist."

Quote:

Do you even have a basic understanding of Darwinian evolution?


As a matter of fact I do, and Darwin himself knew that all his theories depended upon finding intermediate fossils which he assumed a later generation would find. We never found them.

Quote:

He found that the species there were very similar, obviously derived from, specias formt he South American mainland.

obviously derived from? What species obvously derives from what other species? You cant put a monkey next to a man and say that man is obviously deriven from monkeys, thats not scientific at all.


Quote:

But that each speicas had apparently aquired adaptations to specifc environmental conditions. For instance, very closely related birds had differnt beak lengths and so on.. which could be explained by feeding methods and availablitiy of food.

Adaptation is NOT evolution, now Im wondering if YOU have any knowledge of the basic of Darwin's theory.

Quote:

This was the beginning of the theory, and this is how science works, forming a general conclusion from specific evidence. Since his time, much more has been learned, and eveything confirms that the principle is sound. In fact evolution is the BASIS of all the biological sciences. Modern biology started with Darwin.

Once again your coming out with all kinds of statements that have no scientific basis at all.

Quote:

Genetics becomes arbitrary and meaningless.

How?

Quote:

Taxonomies are irrelevant.

So it becomes irrelevant to name species? How are we going to classify things?

Quote:

It it would like taking Newton away from physics, because he is cornerstone of physical theory

Newton had math and science experimentation to back him up, Darwin has nothing. And Newton was a very sold out fanatical born again Christian.

Quote:

but dont expect intelligent poeple to take you seriously.

What intelligent people? I dont see any intelligence at all in the post you made. It was just a bunch of opinion and rhetoric.