Quote:

[...]these "viewpoints" of evolution and all have not been proven, as someone said earlier on its a THEORY not a LAW there is a major difference.


What is your definition of a theory and a law? What is your definition of a proof?
There are a lot of famous theories: Maxwell's Equations, The Special and General Relativity, The Standard Model, The theory of Evolution...
Would you say that some of them are more proved than others? Fair enough, but which is the more reliable and which is the less reliable and why is that?

Quote:

A law would be something like the world being round


This is not a law. This is merely an empirical fact. A law has to be more general than that. You have to be able to make general predictions from it, at least.

Quote:

Evolution is just another way that a scientist is trying to use to help explain why we are here and how we got here,


This is not the case. Evolution is an observable phenomena. This is what we see if we observe the nature without prejudice. Because of this it's sound to form a theory based on this phenomena; a theory useful for making predictions.
What's behind this theory, whether it is the Christian God or it is The Famous Turtle, science really don't care about as long as it works better than any other theory.

Quote:

Scientists can prove things with their God-given talents


And this is where you got it all wrong. Scientists can't prove anything, at least not in the name of science. Science isn't about proof!