One vs. Two vs. Many

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: One vs. Two vs. Many [Re: Marco_Grubert] #66712 03/15/06 23:32 03/15/06 23:32
Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,377 USofA fastlane69 OP Senior Expert
fastlane69 OP Senior Expert Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,377 USofA	Quote: It doesn't ? I was thinking about Lorentz-Transformations where your term approaches 0 when v<<c. But nevertheless special relativity would still apply, only it would be hard to measure. Consider the limit to this statement... relativity doesn't apply to an object at REST with it's environment yet Newtonian Physics does. An object at rest with it's environment would experience neither time dialation nor length contraction, the hallmarks of relativity. Quote: fastlane: for this to make any sense whatsoever, could you please give your complete definition of "god" ? Jeesh, no tall order there. Let's take a minimialist approach: God is a being more powerful than any human that cannot be seen by conventional means (ie EM radiation) and has a lifetime on the order of the lifetime of the universe. Can we work with that? FUTUR-E-SCAPE: The Future Landscape of Education and Entertainment.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 14:21
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	ROMAC	03/15/06 14:24
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 14:32
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/15/06 14:46
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 14:55
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	jcl	03/15/06 15:21
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 19:01
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Marco_Grubert	03/15/06 20:56
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Scramasax	03/15/06 21:16
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 23:32
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Marco_Grubert	03/16/06 01:05
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/16/06 02:57
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/16/06 07:13
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/15/06 23:00
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/15/06 15:24
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 15:47
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/15/06 16:31
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	ICEman	03/15/06 16:55
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/15/06 18:26
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 18:58
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/15/06 22:51
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/15/06 23:43
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	ICEman	03/16/06 00:42
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/16/06 07:28
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/16/06 14:47
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/16/06 17:11
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/16/06 17:39
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/16/06 19:10
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/16/06 20:09
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Matt_Aufderheide	03/16/06 20:38
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	AndersA	03/16/06 23:31
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/17/06 00:44
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Matt_Aufderheide	03/17/06 07:47
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/17/06 15:36
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Matt_Aufderheide	03/17/06 21:11
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	NITRO777	03/17/06 21:29
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	fastlane69	03/17/06 22:03
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Matt_Aufderheide	03/17/06 22:28
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	NITRO777	03/17/06 23:06
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	NITRO777	03/17/06 23:41
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Matt_Aufderheide	03/17/06 23:55
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	NITRO777	03/18/06 00:08
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	mpdeveloper_B	03/18/06 04:23
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	ICEman	03/18/06 04:40
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Matt_Aufderheide	03/18/06 06:37
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	NITRO777	03/18/06 13:36
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Scramasax	03/18/06 19:58
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	mpdeveloper_B	03/19/06 00:04
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Grimber	03/17/06 22:18
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Anonymous	10/01/06 11:20
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many	Alberto	10/01/06 12:32

Moderated by jcl, Lukas, old_bill, Spirit