Hilbert's Hotel
Diskussionsforum zur Unendlichkeit: Theismus, Atheismus, Primzahlen, Unsterblichkeit, das Universum...
Discussing Infinity:
theism and atheism, prime numbers, immortality, cosmology, philosophy...
|
|
|
2 registered members (vicknick, AndrewAMD),
1,292
guests, and 3
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: One vs. Two vs. Many
[Re: fastlane69]
#66718
03/16/06 07:28
03/16/06 07:28
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 54
AndersA
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is no such thing as a scientific proof. Science doesn't do proofs; logic and math do proofs
ROFL. You're a mathematician, aren't you? 
We have a "different" way of proving things than philosophers and mathematicians: it's called the scientific method. And it has successfully "proven" many things.
No I'm a physicist and that's why I know that the scientific method is the contrary to proving things, rather.
To be correct, the scientific method has been unsuccessful in disproving many things. These things, not yet disproved, are what we call knowledge.
Logic do proofs, science doesn't.
Science might give you an indication of whether there seems to be no, one or several gods, but then you have to give us something to fail to disprove.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
