Suffice it to say that I do know "a little" about science, that no where in my posts did I mention that "science = truth", that physics experiments are not like the life science experiements that "require" a null hypothesis, and that science has an established track record of proving things -- unless you are here to tell me my collegues and I that neutrinos haven't been proven... maybe that was your dissertation?

I agree wholeheartedly that it's the arguement that matters and since I find your arguments to be naive from a professional scientific viewpoint and you perceive my curiosity as to your scientific background as an attempt at a pissing contest, I shall leave your arguements alone to sink or swim as others see fit.

I peacefully bow out from any further engagement with you, Master Anders.