Quote:

Maybe. But this thread is not about belief because you can not discuss or argue about belief. It's about _scientific_ arguments of creationism. Young earth creationists claim, for instance, that an earth age of 6000 years is more likely than 4.5 billion years - let's hear their reasons.



You may not have been asking what I think are their reasons, but it's the truth regardless.

They dont have any scientific reasons. Their argument is purely emotional. The psuedoscience arguments they do come up with are transparent, and not worth taking your time to look at.

The simple fact is, they say the Earth is 6000 years old becasue that's what Archbishop Usher said, because he calculated it from the Biblical generation lists.

They have no scientific basis for their beliefs, they just pretend there is.

Sphere Engine--the premier A6 graphics plugin.