Quote:

A brilliant observation. So, there being absolutely no evidence at all for creationism, it seems it is the weakest idea around.

Seriously, what evidence do you have for your position? None. All you can do is attack evolution, and hope this somehow helps your own claim, when inreality you have absolutely no positive evidenec for a creator or creation.



Well...maybe I do that because evolution is the exact opposite of creation. So if something about evolution is necessarily false, then that aspect of creation is necessarily true. But I wouldn't claim to have 'evidence' of a creator (except His design) because we can't put a creator in a test tube.

But let's put it this way. One proof of a necessary creation is that mutations will never write new animals. Now, ignoring that actual debate, it will necessarily fall to evolution. We'll debate specific instances of mutations that you suppose are valid for evolution because there's no where else to go. So the debate will almost always fall back on evolution by default.

"The task force finds that...the unborn child is a whole human being from the moment of fertilization, that all abortions terminate the life of a human being, and that the unborn child is a separate human patient under the care of modern medicine."