RATE. I provided links, its peer-reviewed.

Of course, amateur evolutionists are conditioned to believe that creationists aren't peer-reviewed, that they don't do any 'real' science, and that they have no Ph.D's.

You could look up the Creation Research Society Quarterly publication, or the Technical Journal publication. Both are peer-reviewed, and both are creationist.

I would subscribe to the CRSQ, but I probably wouldn't understand it. Although I'm planning on subscribing once I'm in the middle of schooling, or once I'm done with schooling.

Otherwise, if you want more information, click the links I provided. Two of the links are from one of the geologists who worked on the RATE project.

If you want a specific source, feel free to check out this:

(CRSQ 2004) Humphreys, D. R., S. A. Austin, J. R. Baumgardner, and A. A. Snelling, Helium diffusion age of 6,000 years supports accelerated nuclear decay, Creation Research Society Quarterly, 41(1), 1-16, 2004. See http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/41/41_1/Helium_lo_res.pdf.

To further damage the unrelenting religious bigotry of evolutionists, the evolutionist predictions of magnetic fields is off, and the YEC view on God's creation of magnetic fields is on.

http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/21/21_3/21_3.html

Hm. Could it be? Creation science is science after all? I wouldn't have thought it the way you guys were talking.