It is quite funny how creationists "review" their own pamphlets and call that "peer review". However, peer review means that a group of _independent scientists_ review articles meant for publication in _real_ scientific journals, like "Science" or "Nature".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

Creationists seem to only publish inside their religious circle, and do not communicate with the scientific community. As to my knowledge they haven't published a single creationist article in any peer reviewed scientific journal so far.

Quote:

Helium diffusion age of 6,000 years supports accelerated nuclear decay, Creation Research Society Quarterly



Have you read that article? Even a layman can see the nonsense in those "Helium discoveries". In his calculations the author just ignored the effect of pressure on helium diffusion, and therefore his results were all wrong. And if you read his desparate answers on the rebuttals, you'll see that they didn't contain anything new, just a repetition of his arguments and an attack on the person who debunked his idea. In fact he should be grateful that a scientist took him serious enough to undertake the effort of debunking.

More interesting however is the mentioned "accelerated nuclear decay" on which this helium pamplet is based. This is indeed such a funny example of creationist faith that it's worth to be explained here:

As creationists learned to their dismay that radioactive decay proved an earth age of billions of years, they invented the "accelerated decay" idea to save their 6000 years faith. According to their belief, God somehow "accelerated" the radioactive decay in minerals by a factor of several millions to make them look much older as they are.

Unfortunately, any first semester physics student could tell you that such an "accerelated decay" would convert any innocent radioactive mineral into a considerable nuclear reactor! Accelerating the decay several million times would produce enough fission heat to roast Adam and vaporize the oceans. Pity that the "helium" author - and his "peer reviewers" - obviously missed radioactivity in school.

You should not be surprised that all the world is laughing at such creationist "science".