Quote:

So what your arguments still come down to is that creationists aren't peer reviewed. They have two peer reviewed publications, but that isn't good enough because peer review by creationists isn't valid.



I you misundersatand what peer review is supposed to accomplish- it is to ensure that supposedly disinterested parties independently review a paper to check for accuracy, relavance, and so on. I actually believe that most "evolutionists" are going to be much more impartial and qualified to review papers than a creationist.

Therefore the scientific credentials of the reviewer are important, and few creationsists are actually experts in a related scientic field. In other words, I'd be very suprised to find a geology PHD who was also a creationist.

Sphere Engine--the premier A6 graphics plugin.